Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Katiushka Rebeca Acosta-Smith et al v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01467
Plaintiff:
Katiushka Rebeca Acosta-Smith, Rebekah Leann Anderson, James Andrews and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Woodruff
as 3:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
James Woodruff, Leo Cummings, Nurse Suzi Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Partridge et al v. Equifax et al
as 1:2017cv05419
Plaintiff:
Diane Platts, Julia Mendoza, Milo Gene Kartchner, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Equifax and Equifax Information Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz et al v. C. D. or E. F. et al
as 1:2017cv04824
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Miranda Diaz, Helen Brandy Miranda, Arlen Miranda Lopez and others
Defendant:
C. D. or E. F. and E. F. or C. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miranda et al v. Secretary of the U.S. State Department et al
as 1:2017cv04665
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Plutarco Miranda, Roberta Lopez Nepomuseno, Arlen Miranda Lopez and others
Defendant:
Secretary of the U.S. State Department, The Chief, Waiver Review Division, The Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bowling v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robert Leo Bowling
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramirez et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 1:2017cv00553
Plaintiff:
Leo Ramirez and Jessica Ramirez
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCTEAR v. USA
as 7:2016cv00089
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
LEO MCTEAR, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
