Cases 21 - 30 of 714
VERMILLION et al v. CENTURION HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, INC., JOHN L. MERSHON, VERNON L. OSBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHOWERS v. FIRST PREMIER BANK et al
as 1:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
JAMES PAYTON SHOWERS
Defendant:
FIRST PREMIER BANK, LISA GERNER, DARRELL E. SCHMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
WARREN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHLOE WARGNY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIG v. MEANS et al
as 1:2023cv02088
Plaintiff:
HOLDEN ANTHONY CRAIG
Defendant:
KALA ANN MEANS, JEREMY TODD MULL, JEFFREY K. BRANSTETTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BORGES
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
LISA BORGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, LISA HAMBLEN, GRACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BORGES et al
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
LARRY ELVIS HILL
Defendant:
LISA BORGES, RDC RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and SCOTT BLACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2023cv01925
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
MCCAFFERTY, SHAVER, LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
LISA J. SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
