Cases 21 - 30 of 43
IN RE: TARIQ SULTAN BROWN
as 2:2021cv02871
Petitioner:
TARIQ SULTAN BROWN
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF KATAYOUN M. COPELAND DELAWARE COUNTY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MACK v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2021cv00593
Petitioner:
BOBBI JO MACK
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE OLIVER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MACK v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2021cv00130
Petitioner:
BOBBI JO MACK
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE OLIVER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DALY v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2021cv00281
Petitioner:
LAUREN DALY
Respondent:
LONNIE OLIVER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00023
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, DR. KROSS, MS. BLAKELY and others
Plaintiff:
SAM DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Butler et al v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2019cv02171
Defendant:
Lonnie Oliver, Dorina Varner, J. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremey Melvin and Shariff Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2019cv04771
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE OLIVER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Petitioner:
MONIQUE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FENNELL v. PIROZZOLA et al
as 3:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, LONNIE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VO v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00084
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT LONNIE OLIVER and DOC SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
KIM VO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEDESCO v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00028
Plaintiff:
TINA TEDESCO
Defendant:
MS. S. ANDERSON, LONNIE OLIVER and MR. JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
