Cases 21 - 30 of 488
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 23-20404
Petitioner / Appellant:
Luis Carlos Rodriguez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rodriguez v. Central American Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
Luis Alan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Central American Transport, Inc. and Terraille Orlander Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RODRIGUEZ v. TRUCK WORLD CORP et al
as 2:2023cv14188
Plaintiff:
LUIS S. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
TRUCK WORLD CORP, TRUCK MOTION CORP, JOAQUIN MARTIARENA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RODRIGUEZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
LUIS ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. Rodriguez
as 23-50432
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Felipe Rodriguez, also known as Vaquero
USA v. Sanchez Rodriguez
as 23-50395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jorge Luis Sanchez Rodriguez, Jr.
Rodriguez-Jimenez v. DynaCom Management, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02893
Plaintiff:
Luis M. Rodriguez-Jimenez
Defendant:
DynaCom Management, LLC, Mland Maintenance LLC,, DynaCom Management, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
VELAZQUEZ- RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08841
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUIS VELAZQUEZ- RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
