Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Gourley v. Coonrod et al
as 1:2020cv20955
Defendant:
Mark S. Inch, State of Florida, Melinda N. Coonrod and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Gourley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LONG v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2019cv00213
Defendant:
JULIA MCCALL, JIMMY T PATRONIS, JR, MELINDA N COONROD and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. BONDI et al
as 4:2018cv00397
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, PAMELA JO BONDI and MELINDA N COONROD
Plaintiff:
CLINTON ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Jones v. Tena Pate, et al
as 18-10940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LEE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
TENA M. PATE, in her individual capacity, MELINDA N. COONROD, in her individual capacity, BERNARD COHEN, in his individual capacity and others
Carlos Crespo v. Florida Commission on Offender, et al
as 17-12007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS CRESPO
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW and MELINDA N. COONROD, Chairperson
HAND et al v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL HAND , JOSEPH JAMES GALASSO , HAROLD W GIRCSIS, JR and others
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT , PAM BONDI , JEFF ATWATER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sampson Courtney v. Florida Parole Commission, et al
as 16-16658
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMPSON COURTNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, CHAIRMAN, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and MELINDA N. COONROD
Theodore Menut v. Florida Commission on Offender, et al
as 16-15007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE MENUT
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, TENA M. PATE, BERNARD COHEN, SR. and others
HORNES v. JONES
as 3:2016cv00121
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER M HORNES
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY and MELINDA N COONROD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. PATE et al
as 4:2016cv00170
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE LEE JONES
Defendant:
TENA M PATE , MELINDA N COONROD , BERNARD COHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
