Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Lapir v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00940
Petitioner:
Moses Okello Lapir
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watkins v. Doan et al
as 2:2016cv00363
Plaintiff:
Reuben Watkins
Defendant:
Doan, SCORE Jail, Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Cowlitz County et al
as 3:2015cv05074
Plaintiff:
Roddy E. Avery
Defendant:
Cowlitz County , Marin Fox Hight , Blain Lux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hitchcock v. Moses Lake, City of et al
as 2:2014cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Hitchcock
Defendant:
Moses Lake, City of , Moses Lake Police Department , Dean Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hansen v. Moses Lake Irrigation & Rehabilitation Dist et al
as 2:2014cv00357
Respondent:
Moses Lake Irrigation & Rehabilitation Dist , Ron Covey , Mary Perry and others
Petitioner:
Michael Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Mazza et al
as 3:2014cv05618
Plaintiff:
Christopher Noel McDonald
Defendant:
Tony Mazza, Marin Fox Hight, Blain Lux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Moses Lake Police Dept et al
as 4:2014cv05039
Plaintiff:
Dustin Blane Goodwin
Defendant:
Moses Lake Police Dept, Grant County Jail and Grant County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCloud v. Mosely et al
as 3:2013cv05675
Plaintiff:
Mark McCloud
Defendant:
Mosely, Vonn, Pierce County Medical Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brockbank et al v. Staples et al
as 3:2013cv05168
Plaintiff:
Donnamay Brockbank and Dennis Moses
Defendant:
Kevin Staples , Barbara Staples and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Moses v. King County et al
as 2:2012cv01964
Plaintiff:
Corinna Moses
Defendant:
King County, Mary Pat Sweetman, Diane Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
