Cases 21 - 30 of 227
Mason v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
French Mason and French Mason-Bey
Defendant:
William Hyatte, J Shoffner, A Miller and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DROGOSZ v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv02941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DROGOSZ and MICHAEL DAREK DROGOSZ
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, MS ABRHAMS, MS METCALF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATEMAN v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2021cv02627
Plaintiff:
VERNON BATEMAN and VERNON T BATEMAN
Defendant:
KNIGHT, JOHN DOES and MS. CARNEYGEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAY v. RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv02522
Defendant:
HAWK, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capatina v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Max Capatina
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Wexford Health, Eskenazi Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
VELEZ v. EWERS et al
as 2:2021cv00276
Plaintiff:
ANGELO VELEZ, JR.
Defendant:
LT. EWERS, SGT. BARLOW, SGT. BUGSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPARKS v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01635
Defendant:
MR. WILSON, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS., GEO GROUP INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL HERBERT SPARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
ADAMS v. PERTORIUS et al
as 1:2021cv01187
Defendant:
TOMAW, MS. TURNER, MS. FEMI and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
