Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
LeBlanc v. Town of Jackson, et al
as 3:2014cv00488
Defendant:
Fred Allen, Charles Coleman, Jackson Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Connie Smith LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maes v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2013cv00595
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Tim Delaney, Louisiana Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
David Maes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maples v. Tanner et al
as 2:2013cv02535
Plaintiff:
Charles Maples
Defendant:
Robert Tanner
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
F. Gerald Maples, P.A. v. Donziger et al
as 2:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
F. Gerald Maples, P.A.
Defendant:
Stephen R. Donziger and William Carmody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Landry v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2012cv00311
Defendant:
Kevin Benjamin, Burl Cain, Chadwick Darbonne and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
TBS North American Liner, Ltd. v. Maple Mighty M/V et al
as 2:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
TBS North American Liner, Ltd.
Defendant:
Maple Mighty M/V and Pacific Bulk Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Feltey v. B&B Red Maple Restaurant, L.L.C.
as 2:2010cv02772
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Feltey
Defendant:
B&B Red Maple Restaurant, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Shorts v. Maple Cafe Restaurant
as 2:2010cv01703
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Felton Shorts
Defendant:
Maple Cafe Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
