Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aaron v. Markel
as 2:2011cv10232
Plaintiff:
Leetandra Aaron
Defendant:
Sarah Markel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Markel American Insurance Company v. Olsen
as 2:2010cv11667
Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lorn H Olsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Allen v. Morris et al
as 2:2010cv11612
Plaintiff:
Markell Allen
Defendant:
Adlone Morris, Helen Tessen-Jones, Carry Shultz and others
Markel Insurance Company of Canada v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company et al
as 1:2009cv01072
Plaintiff:
Markel Insurance Company of Canada
Defendant:
Progressive Michigan Insurance Company, Unknown Party and DeWitt, Charter Township of, Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Aaron v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2009cv12638
Plaintiff:
Leetandra Aaron
Defendant:
Detroit, City of and Sarah Markel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Type:
Torts - Injury
Markel v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2008cv14407
Plaintiff:
Vanessa J Markel
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marsh v. Booker
as 2:2008cv12250
Petitioner:
Markell Marsh
Respondent:
Raymond Booker
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gyarmati v. Markel American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2007cv11270
Plaintiff:
Tibor Gyarmati
Defendant:
Markel American Insurance Company and TMS National, Incorporated
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
ThirdParty Defendant:
Atlantic Boat Repair, Incorporated and Vincent Locicero
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Michigan, State of v. Transport Magog Express et al
as 2:2007cv10637
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of
Defendant:
Markel Insurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
