Cases 21 - 30 of 346
Marshall v. USA
as 5:2023cv01978
Petitioner:
Delamon A. Marshall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02811
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Marshall and Kimberly Marshall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Warren v. U S Marshall Service
as 1:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Joyce Warren
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and U S Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Marshall v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02378
Plaintiff:
Edgar Marshall
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. U.S. Marshals
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
McKale Hill
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendrix v. Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
as 3:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Mark Hendrix and Kaitlyn Theil
Defendant:
Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Leguire v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
Matthias Leguire
Defendant:
The City of Findlay, Mayor Christina Muryn, Donald Rasmussen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thiel v. Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
as 3:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Thiel
Defendant:
Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El-Bey v. Butler County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Butler County Jail, Richard K. Jones, Sheriff, Robert Carpenter; 2675 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
