Cases 21 - 30 of 288
Doherty v. Gorton et al
as 3:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
James Doherty
Defendant:
Mayor Linda Gorton, U.S. Marshal Joseph M. McClain, Columbus Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Eagle et al v. Meador et al
as 6:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Robert Eagle and Suzanne Marshall
Defendant:
Investigator Jason Meador and Deputy John Koda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. USA
as 4:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Rodrick Earl Marshall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
H.M. v. TJX Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00050
Defendant:
TJX Companies, Inc., Marshalls of MA, Inc. and H.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00052
Plaintiff:
Sherry Marshall
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC, Philips Holding USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Allen et al
as 1:2021cv01114
Plaintiff:
Arthur Marshall, Corey A. Sellers, Nathaniel Waddy and others
Defendant:
Mike Allen, Sgt. A Jackson and William Carrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Joyner et al
as 1:2021cv01076
Plaintiff:
NaQuon Mathis
Defendant:
Joyner, Sample, Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. USA
as 4:2021cv00126
Petitioner:
Rodrick Earl Marshall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
