Cases 21 - 30 of 1,108
Traeger v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv01708
Defendant:
Dallas City Marshals Office, Joshua Jones and U S Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Misty Dawn Traeger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mallard v. Collier et al
as 9:2024cv00126
Defendant:
Unknown Berger, Unknown Marshall, Unknown McNeil and others
Plaintiff:
Chansler Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mallard v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Chansler Mallard
Defendant:
Unknown Marshall, Bryan Collier, Unknown McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Mihalik et al
as 1:2024cv00724
Defendant:
Terrell Ellis, Brice Bishop, Ryan Mihalik and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Mr Cooper Group Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01555
Defendant:
Carlos Pelayo, Ethan Elzen, Kelly Doherty and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Hunt, I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burgess v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Bin Burgess
Defendant:
Turnkey Medical Annex Staff, FNU Marshall and Jeffrey Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. USA
as 5:2024cv00137
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Patrick Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Marshall v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00655
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Brandon Luis Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Randall County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
Christopher Forbis, Amarillo Texas US Marshall Service, Randall Co Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2024cv00196
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Irma Gonzalez Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
