Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Qualls v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Eric Qualls
Defendant:
Debra Johnson, Darrell Murphy, Jason Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Endless Access LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Endless Access LLC, Endless Access Distributors, LLC, Saveonresorts.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Heard v. Crumpton et al
as 3:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Heard
Defendant:
Leslie Crumpton and Christy Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Taylor v. Mathis et al (JRG2)
as 2:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
Steven M Taylor
Defendant:
Chris Mathis, C/O Buckles, Tom Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutting v. Mathis et al
as 2:2014cv00262
Plaintiff:
Oscar Ray Cutting
Defendant:
Chris Mathis, Tom Smith, Ron Street and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Mathis et al
as 2:2014cv02483
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Brittany Mathis and Scott Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kidd v. Mathis Tire and Auto Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02298
Plaintiff:
Billy J. Kidd
Defendant:
Mathis Tire and Auto Service, Inc. and Direct Tire Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DNV Investment Partnership et al v. Regent Private Capital, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02232
Plaintiff:
DNV Investment Partnership, Dale Menard, S. Eugene Mathis, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Regent Private Capital, LLC, Regent Private Capital II LLC, Charles Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pippin v. Carter County Detention Center et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Pippin
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center, Chris Mathis, Lt Fritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
