Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Wagoner v. Ciocca et al
as 1:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Tina Lynne Wagoner
Defendant:
Stephen Ciocca, Troy Westfall, Tina Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McQueen v. The State of New York
as 2:2016cv04306
Plaintiff:
Nicole McQueen
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeil v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00798
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Doctors A, B and C, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McQueen v. The Home Depot USA Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00833
Plaintiff:
Jeffery McQueen
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA Inc. and SRK Elmwood Land Investment, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McQueen v. Superintendent
as 9:2015cv00077
Petitioner:
Guy McQueen
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McQueen v. Strada et al
as 1:2013cv06554
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, D. Garcia and Frank Strada
Petitioner:
Anthony McQueen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
El-Bey v. Anna M. Kross Correction Facility et al et al
as 1:2013cv02956
Defendant:
Anna M. Kross Correction Facility et al, Badge # 15750, Badge # 860 Fulton and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Aristilde El-Bey
RPA:
Janet Runcie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
El-Bey v. Anna M. Kross Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2013cv01213
Defendant:
Anna M. Kross Correctional Facility, Badge #15750, Badge #8092 and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Aristilde El-Bey
RPA:
Janet Runcie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
