Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Thompson v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016ct03249
Plaintiff:
Darrell Thompson
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, Frank L. Perry, IGRB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. DANIEL et al
as 1:2016cv01178
Plaintiff:
JEREMY MARTIN
Defendant:
DENNIS DANIEL, ROBERT OWENS, MARVIN CASINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmartin v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2016ct03058
Plaintiff:
Lawrence P. Gilmartin
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Dr. Land and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alicea v. Wake County Detention Center et al
as 5:2014ct03281
Plaintiff:
Luis Lugo Alicea
Defendant:
Wake County Detention Center, Wake County Sherriff's Office and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobbitt v. Guinn et al
as 5:2014cv00045
Plaintiff:
Willie T. Bobbitt
Defendant:
David Guinn, Marta M. Kalinski, Paula Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Caldwell County Jail Medical Department
as 5:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
William James Thomas Morrison
Defendant:
Caldwell County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DEAL v. SCOTLAND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT HEAD NURSE AND STAFF
as 1:2013cv00602
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
SCOTLAND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT HEAD NURSE AND STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEAL v. CHUNG et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
DR. CHUNG and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deal v. Chung et al
as 5:2013ct03137
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. Chung and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canady v. Hairss et al
as 3:2013de00235
Plaintiff:
Frederick Canady
Defendant:
FNU Hairss, FNU Melvin and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
