Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Karen Clements et al v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv12816
Plaintiff:
Karen Clements, Russell Teel, John Guy and others
Defendant:
Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
McGinnis v. Han et al
as 1:2015cv10234
Plaintiff:
Leon McGinnis
Defendant:
Linda Han, Nicole Medina, Julie Nassif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv11369
Plaintiff:
Christopher Medina
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medina v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2013cv40120
Plaintiff:
Luis D. Medina
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Britain and the United States Bay State Access, City of Worcester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Medina v. Corsini
as 1:2012cv12399
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Medina
Respondent:
Michael Corsini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Clinton
as 1:2012cv11581
Plaintiff:
Igdalia Ortiz Medina
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medina v. New York Community Bank
as 1:2012cv10790
Plaintiff:
Marco Medina
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Medina v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv30059
Plaintiff:
Debbie N. Medina
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Puerta v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv11323
Petitioner:
Antonio Medina Puerta
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez et al v. Lasership, Inc.
as 1:2011cv10990
Plaintiff:
Milton Manuel Sanchez , Carmelo Medina and Gerard Edmond
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
