Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
(PS)Meeks v. Butte County Children's Services Division et al
as 2:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Janai Meeks
Defendant:
Butte County Children's Services Division and Oroville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Whitsitt v. Meeks et al
as 2:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Plummer, San Joaquin County, City of Manteca and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation dba Amtrak
as 4:2020cv09120
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation dba Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Plaintiff:
Dana Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meek v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv08997
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lakiaira Meek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Promise Public Schools, Inc. v. San Jose Unified School District et al
as 3:2020cv08555
Defendant:
Carla Collins, Teresa Castellanos, Jose Magana and others
Plaintiff:
Promise Public Schools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Quaid et al v. Robert Boyett
as 2:2020cv10761
Defendant:
DOES One through Fifty, inclusive, Nancy Goliger, Martin Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Evgenia Quaid and Randy Quaid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darrick H. Meeks, Sr. v. A. Arredondo et al
as 2:2020cv10406
Plaintiff:
Darrick H. Meeks, Sr.
Defendant:
Health Care Compliance Analyst, Warden Sutton and A. Arredondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Katz v. MF Business Development et al
as 3:2020cv05858
Defendant:
Daniel Farris, MF Business Development and Donna Meeks
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Meeks v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01227
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Meeks
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
