Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Homler v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2010cv01154
Plaintiff:
Shirley Homler
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Summer v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Summer
Defendant:
Jerry Glen Cunningham, James Leon Berrong, Randall Mercks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jinks et al v. Merck & Co. Inc.,
as 3:2009cv00611
Plaintiff:
Helen L. Jinks and Herman W. Jinks
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc., and Merck & Co. Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Clark v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00477
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Clark
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Schering-Plough Corporation and Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Taylor v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 2:2008cv02244
Plaintiff:
John Taylor
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lackey v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01043
Plaintiff:
Gary Lackey
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Schering-Plough and Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Igou v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Igou
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc and Schering-Plough Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Merck & Co Inc
as 3:2007cv00488
Plaintiff:
Cora B. Miller
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shaheed v. Merck & Co Inc
as 1:2007cv00264
Plaintiff:
Constance Shaheed
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dawson et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 3:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Philip Dawson and Marilyn Dawson
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
