Cases 21 - 30 of 150
REAVES v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv01982
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. REAVES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH and JOHN MERSHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv15314
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dorsey
Defendant:
David Gomez, Mr. Osbourn, Marlena Henze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2023cv50375
Plaintiff:
Devonte Willis
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Holly Spencer, Kristina Mershon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATKINS v. OSBURN et al
as 1:2023cv01869
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN WATKINS
Defendant:
VERNON OSBURN, MERSHON, LISA HAMBLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Jennings et al
as 3:2023cv50376
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Joseph Jennings, Melvin Hinton, C/O Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IVY v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2023cv01751
Plaintiff:
LYNDALE R. IVY
Defendant:
JOHN L. MERSHON, VERNON OSBURN, KRISTINE PRYOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EMERSON v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01667
Plaintiff:
JERRY EMERSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and MERSHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON and VERNON OSBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATKINS v. REGALE et al
as 1:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN WATKINS
Defendant:
DENNIS REGALE, VERNON OSBURN, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv01329
Plaintiff:
JABREEH DAVIS MARTIN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, JOHN MERSHON, DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
