Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Reavis et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc et al
as 1:2011cv01765
Plaintiff:
Michael William Reavis and Tomasita Reavis
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Zuniga v. The City of Burlington Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv00460
Plaintiff:
Fernando Zuniga
Defendant:
The City of Burlington Police Department , Brett Currie and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nielsen v. Peek et al
as 1:2010cv04021
Plaintiff:
Michael William Nielsen
Defendant:
David Peek, Gwinnett County Department of Corrections and Prison Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nielsen v. Peek et al
as 5:2010cv00469
Plaintiff:
Michael William Nielsen
Defendant:
David Peek, Gwinnett County Department of Corrections and Prison Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Savannah-Chatham County Fair Housing Council, Inc. et al v. Dillon Chu, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Savannah-Chatham County Fair Housing Council, Inc., Richard Sturgess and Daniel Gehringer
Defendant:
Dillon Chu, Inc., Gregory Chu, Michael William Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Williams v. USA
as 7:2008cv90028
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Petitioner:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Ayers
as 1:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
James Michael Williams
Defendant:
Doctor Ayers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanks v. Williams et al
as 4:2007cv00177
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Sanks
Defendant:
Michael Williams and B. Goulic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clark et al
as 1:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
James Michael Williams
Defendant:
Jackson Clark and Donnie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
