Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund v. Stoelting et al
as 2:2017cv01788
Defendant:
Ivor J. Evans, Scott D Rued, Chad M. Utrup and others
Plaintiff:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knox v. Kuhnmuench et al
as 2:2017cv01637
Plaintiff:
Alexia Knox
Defendant:
Mary Kuhnmuench, Joseph Donald, Marshall B Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Adamzak, Chad et al v. Capstan Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00638
Plaintiff:
Chad Adamzak , James Berg , James Brown and others
Defendant:
Capstan Corporation, Northern Engineering Company, LLC and The Interlake Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. Stoelting et al
as 2:2017cv00893
Plaintiff:
Jesse Kent
Defendant:
Scott D. Rued, Ivor J. Evans, Curtis Stoelting and others
Nominal Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. and Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lamb v. Walker et al
as 2:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lamb
Defendant:
Gov Walker, Sheriff Clark, Captain Sobek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Mishlove
as 2:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kay Murray
Defendant:
Michael Mishlove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Murray v. Litwin
as 2:2015cv01441
Plaintiff:
Derek Murray
Defendant:
Richard Litwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Murray v. Baenen
as 2:2014cv00205
Petitioner:
Derek Murray
Respondent:
Michael R Baenen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
