Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Radick v. USA et al
as 1:2010cv02504
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radick
Defendant:
USA, Harley Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STUDNICKA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, DEFENDANTS et al
as 2:2010cv00259
Defendant:
ANNONYMOUS, ANONYMOUS, ANYNOMUS and others
Plaintiff:
MR. SEAN ALLEN STUDNICKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatten v. Andert et al
as 1:2010cv00601
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
R. Andert, A. Barker, J. C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hatten v. Holland, et al
as 10-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND, R. ANDERT, SARA REVELL and others
Moon v. Holinka et al
as 3:2009cv00526
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Carol Holinka, Marion Feather, Mark Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moon v. Holinka et al
as 3:2009cv00524
Petitioner:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Respondent:
Carol Holinka, Marion Feather, Mark Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moon v. Holinka et al
as 3:2009cv00525
Petitioner:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Respondent:
Carol Holinka, Marion Feather, B. Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Twitty v. Wiley, et al
as 09-1009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE J. TWITTY
Defendant - Appellee:
RONNIE WILEY, Warden FLM Max BOP, MIKE NALLEY, Regional Dir. BOP, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director BOP and others
Twitty v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv02333
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
Mike Mukasey, Harley G. Lappin, Harrel Watts and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Twitty v. Wiley et al
as 1:2008cv02251
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
Ronnie Wiley, Mike Nalley, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
