Cases 21 - 30 of 89
HARRIS v. GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
COTY SCOTT HARRIS
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHISON v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv02442
Defendant:
MOORE, DAVIS, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK D.L.S. HUTCHISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv01916
Defendant:
THOMPSON, FRIENCH, CDL PROGRAM and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LOUIS WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWANN v. SEVIER et al
as 2:2020cv00320
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, ASSISTANT WARDEN OF OPERATIONS FOR NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and DAVIS
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ et al v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv01700
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. VASQUEZ
Defendant:
R. FOUST, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARLAND v. GEO GROUP: NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2020cv01540
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GARLAND
Defendant:
GEO GROUP: NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2020cv00713
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv00626
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and GEO GROUP
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04137
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC., SCOTT FITCH and others
Plaintiff:
JARROCCO WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEWISH v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF
as 1:2019cv02266
Plaintiff:
KING JEW JEWISH and DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
