Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hines v. Blum
as 21-1914
Petitioner:
Dashon Hines
Respondent:
Katie S. Blum, Esq., New York State Division of Human Rights
Hines v. New York State Division of Hum
as 21-1665
Petitioner:
Dashon Hines
Respondent:
New York State Division of Human Rights Staff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines v. New York State Division of Human Rights Staff
as 1:2021cv04629
Plaintiff:
Dashon Hines
Defendant:
New York State Division of Human Rights Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pd
D'Ambrosio v. Bast Hatfield, Inc., et al
as 20-1455
Defendant:
William P. Marks, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the New York State Division of Human Rights
Counter Claimant:
Michael Salisbury, Project Manager, Bast Hatfield, Inc. and AJ Lomnes, Vice President
Appellant:
Larry D'Ambrosio, DBA Western Contractors
Defendant / Appellee:
Lois McLaughlin, in her official capacity as minority representative of the WarnerHolmes Project for the New York State University Construction Fund
Pilchman v. National Labor Relations Board
as 20-52
Defendant / Appellee:
National Labor Relations Board, New York State Public Relations Board, Brooklyn Public Library and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Pilchman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
