Cases 21 - 30 of 409
Rochester v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00140
Defendant:
B Stirling, S Louis, Beth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Stirling et al
as 2:2018cv03245
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Officer John Doe 2, A Gladwell and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ravenel v. Dunlap et al
as 9:2018cv02792
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Nurse Deborah Richter, Lieutenant NFN Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Vashaun Ravenel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. United States et al
as 9:2018cv02322
Defendant:
United States, Major Timothy Clark, Assoc Warden Ann Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lamont Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Aiken County Detention Center et al
as 9:2018cv02180
Defendant:
Nurse NFN Shellie, Lt Bowman, Deputy Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Shah Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Becker et al
as 9:2018cv02181
Defendant:
Chief Harvey Becker, Sheriff Lewis, Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ravenel et al v. Lane et al
as 9:2018cv02137
Defendant:
J Robertson, Charles Williams, NFN Marshal and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Grampus, Vashaun Ravenel, Anthony C Shy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Toth et al
as 6:2018cv01979
Respondent:
Unknown Richland Co Ct HO, NFN Hall, Ms Toth and others
Petitioner:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Leaphart v. Stirling et al
as 9:2018cv01667
Plaintiff:
Jason Leaphart
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, John B McRee and NFN Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 9:2018cv01408
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L Crawford
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Bryan Stirling, Warden Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
