Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Schofield et al v. Manchester et al
as 3:2012cv00544
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Schofield and Nancy Matthews
Defendant:
Town of Manchester , South Windsor Police Dept , Michael Magrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Naugatuck et al
as 3:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Joni Norton
Defendant:
Borough of Naugatuck and Colin McAllister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. 51 Parcels of Property et al
as 3:2010cv00774
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
51 Parcels of Property, 197-199 Bassett St, 25-29 Batter Terrace and others
Claimant:
Menachem Levitin, 161 Edgewood LLC, ADM Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Villeneuve v. State of CT et al
as 3:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Mark Villeneuve
Defendant:
State of CT, Salvatore DiPiano, Richard Florentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Southington et al
as 3:2009cv01515
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
Town of Southington, GenCorp Inc., Kraft Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
State of CT v. Southington et al
as 3:2009cv01516
Plaintiff:
State of CT and State of CT
Defendant:
Town of Southington, GenCorp Inc., Kraft Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Byrd et al v. Bayer Corp et al
as 3:2009cv00525
Plaintiff:
Alice Byrd, Etta Calhoun, Alice Mayberry and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pickles v. Lantz et al
as 3:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Scott Pickles
Defendant:
Lantz, Wayne Choinski, Peter Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
