Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Windsor v. NYCPD 5 et al
as 1:2015cv03494
Plaintiff:
Allen Windsor
Defendant:
NYCPD 5 and NYC Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendeng v. NYCPD - Precinct 025 et al
as 1:2014cv08271
Plaintiff:
Victor Mendeng
Defendant:
NYCPD - Precinct 025 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stephen et al
as 1:2014cv05126
Defendant:
City of New York and Lt. Sasha Stephen
True Names Unknown:
NYCPD P.O. John Does (s) 1 through 5
Plaintiff:
Scott Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. NYCPD PC1028 et al
as 1:2014cv01730
Plaintiff:
Bryant Green
Defendant:
NYCPD PC1028
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Reiner
as 13-4277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Miguel Cruz
Defendant - Appellee:
Maria Parks, Jonathan Reiner, Assistant District Attorney, Lawrence O. and others
Candelaria v. The Corporate City of New York
as 13-1109
Petitioner:
Juan Candelaria
Respondent:
The Corporate City of New York, ("NYC"), Department of Corrections, ("DOC"), Martin F. Horn, Commissioner and others
Cruz v. Reiner
as 12-4241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Miguel Cruz
Defendant:
Maria Parks and Lawrence O.
Defendant - Appellee:
Jonathan Reiner, Assistant District Attorney, Maria Linares, ADA, David Cooke, AKA Cooke and others
Blount v. Mayors Office et al
as 1:2012cv07596
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blount
Defendant:
Mayors Office, NYCPD, Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Candelaria v. The Corporate City of New York
as 12-3680
Petitioner:
Juan Candelaria
Respondent:
The Corporate City of New York, ("NYC"), Department of Corrections, ("DOC"), Martin F. Horn, Commissioner and others
Sorodsky et al v. US Attorney et al
as 1:2012cv04420
Defendant:
Justice Betsy Barros, Ellen Bieben, Anthony Bocola and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Sorodsky and Michail Sorodsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
