Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Readnour v. Berry et al
as 1:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jack Readnour
Defendant:
Ted Berry, Nadine Allen, Phillip Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Henderson v. State of Ohio, et al.
as 1:2014cv02826
Plaintiff:
Paul S. Henderson
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Anthony Quirino, Bob Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Bane v. Horseshoe Cleveland Management, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01949
Plaintiff:
Nadine Bane
Defendant:
Horseshoe Cleveland Management, LLC , Kevin Sayers and Tosha Tousant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Henry v. Allen et al
as 2:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Henry
Defendant:
Nadine Allen, Seth S Tieger, Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Allen et al
as 1:2013cv00701
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Henry
Defendant:
Nadine Allen , Seth S Tieger, Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumbus v. Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2013cv01221
Plaintiff:
Brian Lumbus, Jr.
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department, Mr. Harris, Mr. Kaleta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Chicago and Midwest Joint Board Unite Here and Its Affiliated Local 12
as 1:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Nadine Weaver
Defendant:
Chicago and Midwest Joint Board Unite Here and Its Affiliated Local 12
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Weaver v. Ovations Food Services, LP et al
as 1:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
Nadine Weaver
Defendant:
Ovations Food Services, LP and Comcast-Spectator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Faulk et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22869
Plaintiff:
Carlton Faulk and Nadine Faulk
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
