Cases 21 - 30 of 150
Pike v. Tabor Correctional Institution
as 5:2022ct03381
Plaintiff:
Nathan Pike
Defendant:
Tabor Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02167
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Black v. United States of America
as 5:2022hc02145
Petitioner:
Jared Nathan Black
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WILSON v. DOWTIN
as 1:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILSON
Defendant:
ELOISE DOWTIN
Pike v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Nathan Pike
Respondent:
State of North Carolina, Caldwell County, Catawba County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guarascio v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03172
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Guarascio
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. SAMPSON
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILSON
Defendant:
ALESHA SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILSON v. KING
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILSON
Defendant:
PAUL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Pike v. Grubbs
as 5:2022ct03130
Plaintiff:
Nathan Pike
Defendant:
Billy Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America et al v. Epperley et al
as 5:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company and Travelers Commercial Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nelson R. Epperley and Nathan Jester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
