Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Scott v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00719
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Chavez, Hoagland and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Joe Scott, Jr. v. Renee Baker, et al
as 16-16644
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE NATHAN SCOTT, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kiser v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00238
Petitioner:
Nathan Scott Kiser
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Tx
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SCOTT v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02506
Plaintiff:
NATHAN SCOTT
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. Priority Energy Services, LLC
as 7:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
Micheal Allen and Nathan Scott Harris
Defendant:
Priority Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Allen et al v. Wild Well Control, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03711
Plaintiff:
Micheal Allen and Nathan Scott Harris
Defendant:
BTI Services, Inc. and Warrior Energy Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Scott v. Baker et al
as 3:2015cv00231
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Joe Nathan Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Baker et al
as 3:2014cv00624
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Joe Nathan Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Standley v. Scott et al
as 2:2014cv00588
702) 727-1401 (fax:
D3B, LLC. and Nathan Scott
702) 434-1488 (fax:
Iryna Standley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Scott et al v. Jackson
as 3:2013cv01558
Plaintiff:
Nathan Scott and Martinique Scott
Defendant:
Willie Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
