Cases 21 - 30 of 233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01596
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ernesto Nava v. Kates
as 2:2021cv07182
Petitioner:
Ernesto Nava
Respondent:
Kates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogelio Nava v. Mental Health Courthouse, County of Los Angeles
as 2:2021cv07413
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Nava
Defendant:
Mental Health Courthouse, County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Aceves v. City of Long Beach et al
as 2:2021cv04625
Defendant:
City of Long Beach, John Anthony Moran, Officer John Anthony Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Aceves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Nava v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2021cv00594
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alarcon Nava
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Hammler v. Allison et al
as 1:2021cv00122
Defendant:
T. Sanders, Ralph Diaz, D. Nava and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez et al v. State of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Gutierrez, Sr., Maria Nava and Ramiro Gutierrez
Defendant:
Centinela State Prison, Raymond Madden, State of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Griselda Nava v. Parkwest Rehabilitation Center, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv07571
Defendant:
PARKWEST REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, CRYSTAL SOLORZANO, RENEW HEALTH GROUP, OOC and others
Plaintiff:
GRISELDA NAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
(HC) Nava v. Becerra
as 1:2020cv01378
Respondent:
Xavier Becerra
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alarcon Nava
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bobby Nava v. California State Superior Court et al
as 2:2020cv09045
Defendant:
Lt. Grant, Mark Meza, Sgt. Edge and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Nava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
