Cases 21 - 30 of 239
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Juan Carlos Nava v. Chad Bianco et al
as 5:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Nava
Defendant:
Chad Bianco and DOES 1-30
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Nava v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nava
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nava et al v. Countywide Mechanical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02118
Plaintiff:
Moises Nava and Devin Vester
Defendant:
Countywide Mechanical Systems, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm
Asencion Ginez Dominguez et al v. Leonidas Osorio
as 2:2021cv09022
Defendant:
Leonidas Osorio, Rony Osorio, Antonio Mendez an individual doing business as La Unica Internacional Sonora Santanera S. de RL doing business as La Internacional Sonora Santanera SA de CV and others
Plaintiff:
Asencion Ginez Dominguez and Yolanda Almazan Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01596
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rogelio Nava v. Mental Health Courthouse, County of Los Angeles
as 2:2021cv07413
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Nava
Defendant:
Mental Health Courthouse, County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernesto Nava v. Kates
as 2:2021cv07182
Petitioner:
Ernesto Nava
Respondent:
Kates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bobby Aceves v. City of Long Beach et al
as 2:2021cv04625
Defendant:
City of Long Beach, John Anthony Moran, Officer John Anthony Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Aceves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
