Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Mehroke et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2013at00353
Defendant:
Nirmal Singh, Nachhattar S. Chandi, Susana E. Chandi and others
Plaintiff:
Kulvir S Mehroke , Bhajan Singh and Kamboj LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mehroke et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2013cv00663
Defendant:
Nirmal Singh, Nachhattar S. Chandi, Susana E. Chandi and others
Plaintiff:
Kulvir S Mehroke , Bhajan Singh and Kamboj LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dhaliwal et al v. Singh et al
as 1:2013cv00484
Defendant:
Nirmal Singh, Nachhattar S. Chandi, Susana E. Chandi and others
Plaintiff:
Jagjeevan K. Dhaliwal and Mohinder S. Gill
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dhaliwal et al v. Singh et al
as 1:2013at00193
Defendant:
Nirmal Singh, Nacchattar Singh Chandi, Susana E. Chandi and others
Plaintiff:
Jagjeevan Dhaliwal and Mohinder Singh Gill
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ram et al v. Lal et al
as 1:2012cv04336
Plaintiff:
Madan Singh Badhan, Paramjit Lal, Sansara Ram and others
Defendant:
Nirmal Singh Daroch, Bhola Klair, Nand Lal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. TAJGUL, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03914
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
TAJGUL, LLC, MANDEEP SINGH and NIRMAL SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nirmal Singh v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-71185
Petitioner:
NIRMAL SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
