Cases 21 - 30 of 58,047
GREEN v. MERGEN et al
as 2:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SHAMAR GREEN
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MERGEN, SERGANT MCLEAN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VOGT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02634
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
IN RE ONIX GROUP, LLC DATA BREACH LITIGATION
as 2:2023cv02288
Plaintiff:
ERIC MEYERS, DONALD OWENS, AIDA ALBINO WIMBUSH and others
Defendant:
ONIX GROUP, LLC and ADDICTION RECOVERY SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCCORD v. VIATRIS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN P. MCCORD and EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS PENSION, ANNUITY AND HEALTH FUNDS (EASC)
Defendant:
VIATRIS INC., MICHAEL GOETTLER, RAJIV MALIK and others
Petitioner:
Charles Mizerany
OWENS et al v. ONIX GROUP, LLC
as 2:2023cv02301
Plaintiff:
DONALD OWENS, Alda Albino and AIDA ALBINO WIMBUSH
Defendant:
ONIX GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Owens v. Williams
as 4:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Jamie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. VIATRIS INC et al
as 2:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
JASON TAYLOR
Defendant:
VIATRIS INC, MICHAEL GOETTLER, RAJIV MALIK and others
OWENS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01516
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OWENS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCH CARNEY, LACOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
