Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Hunt v. Hentz et al
as 3:2012cv01606
Plaintiff:
Gary Hunt , Paul Hunt and Scott Hunt
Defendant:
Donald A. Hentz , Paul Zimmerer , Linda Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PONTON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv02372
Plaintiff:
DONNELL PONTON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DC-33 AFSCME, LOCAL 427, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gardner et al v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2007cv01947
Plaintiff:
Dawn Gardner and Rebecca Jane Thompson
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Luzerne County District Attorney's Office, David W. Lupas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUMBLY v. ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 1:2007cv00234
Petitioner:
EXCEL CRUMBLY
Respondent:
ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and MARILYN S. BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re: St. Paul Travelers Securities Litigation II
as 1:2007mc00072
Plaintiff:
Sidney Kahn
Miscellaneous Party:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General
ROBUS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2007cv00820
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JOSEPH ROBUS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BARRY N. KRAMER, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2007cv00218
Petitioner:
NATHAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE INDIANA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
