Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Schoppe-Rico v. Rupert et al
as 3:2011cv04283
Plaintiff:
John M. Schoppe-Rico
Defendant:
J. L. Rupert, J. Van Valkenburg, C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv03901
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Morales
Defendant:
Mathew Cate, G. D. Lewis, P. T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv02380
Plaintiff:
Jamal Danwell Ortiz
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, D. Foston, D. Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Lewis et al
as 3:2010cv05640
Plaintiff:
Jack L. Morris
Defendant:
G. Lewis, K. Holland, M. Carrasco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
P. T. v. Piedmont Unified School District et al
as 3:2010cv04941
Plaintiff:
P. T.
Defendant:
Piedmont Unified School District , Randall Booker , Karen Shipp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
P. T. v. Piedmont Unified School District et al
as 4:2010cv04941
Plaintiff:
P. T.
Defendant:
Piedmont Unified School District , Randall Booker , Karen Shipp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pratt v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv01143
Plaintiff:
Ryant Trimale Pratt
Defendant:
P. T. Smith, K. McGuyer, Wood and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv00775
Plaintiff:
Charlie E. Brooks
Defendant:
P. T. Smith and R. K. Bell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reyes et al v. Horel et al
as 5:2008cv04561
Plaintiff:
Reuben J. Reyes
Defendant:
Robert Horel, P. T. Smith, Keri Berkler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Howard Nedoss Dontus Lettus Vanderbilt Leonard v. Robert Horel et al
as 2:2007cv07329
Petitioner:
Howard Nedoss Dontus Lettus Laroyce Galloway Vanderbilt Leonard
Respondent:
Robert Horel, P T Smith, Gerald J Levi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
