Cases 21 - 30 of 316
RAJA et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2009cv01836
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD H. RAJA, BUSHRA SIDDIQA and FARHAN H. RAJA
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, MICHAEL AYTES, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mocarski v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2009cv05749
Plaintiff:
Marek Mocarski
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Ruth A. Dorochoff, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00998
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Liao et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv03776
Plaintiff:
Yan Won Liao and Jin Wen Huang
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Rodriguez v. Novak
as 1:2009cv00733
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Olivo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Paul Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
