Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Bush v. Dani et al
as 8:2010cv02953
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Cynthia Dani, Karen R. Lefkowitz, Joseph M. Rigby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Pepco Holdings Inc.
as 1:2010cv00882
Plaintiff:
Vonda Page
Defendant:
Pepco Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Sobo et al v. Pepco Holding Inc.
as 8:2010cv01254
Plaintiff:
Muyiwa Sobo and Brenda Revels
Defendant:
Pepco Holding Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MD Public Service Commission, et al v. FERC
as 09-1296
Petitioner:
Maryland Public Service Commission and New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Municipal Power, Inc., American Public Power Association, Maryland Office of People's Counsel and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Edison Mission Energy, PPL Companies, Liberty Electric Power, LLC and others
Mesh Comm, LLC v. PEPCO Energy Services et al
as 1:2009cv02804
Plaintiff:
Mesh Comm, LLC
Defendant:
PEPCO Energy Services, PEPCO Holdings, Inc. and Silver Spring Networks
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
