Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Duffy v. Moss et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Mark Ethan Duffy
Defendant:
Debbie Moss , Stephanie Simpson , Katie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2010cv02630
Plaintiff:
Louie Reaves, Jr.
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Diggins, Kielar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02534
Plaintiff:
Keith Frazier
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Celia Schwartz, Susan Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallings v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2010cv00600
Petitioner:
Robert E. Stallings
Respondent:
Pam Ploughe and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallin v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2010cv00598
Petitioner:
Oloyea D. Wallin
Respondent:
Pam Ploughe and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dembry v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2009cv02695
Petitioner:
Anthony S. Dembry
Respondent:
Pam Ploughe and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denison v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2009cv02153
Petitioner:
Jeremy Nechol Denison
Respondent:
Pam Ploughe and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2009cv01911
Petitioner:
Nam Nguyen
Respondent:
Pam Ploughe and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Denver Public Library et al
as 1:2009cv01748
Plaintiff:
Kevin Thomas
Defendant:
Denver Public Library, Denver Public Library Commission, The, Kevin O'Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
