Cases 21 - 30 of 135
Akula v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Shiva Akula
Defendant:
Bernard Cassidy, Palmetto GBA, LLC, Kelly Melech Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Arrow Child & Family Ministries v. Rite of Passage, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Arrow Child & Family Ministries
Defendant:
Rite of Passage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Akula v. Cassidy et al
as 0:2023cv60034
Plaintiff:
Shiva Akula
Defendant:
Bernard Cassidy, Palmetto GBA, LLC, Kelly Melech Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rainey v. Luther et al
as 9:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Rainey
Defendant:
Deputy Luther, Mayyo, Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumpter v. Passage
as 22-3161
Petitioner / Appellant:
Terrell Sumpter
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Passage, NYS DOCCS Mid-State Correctional Facility
McGloun v. Passage
as 9:2022cv01000
Petitioner:
Jovon McGloun
Respondent:
Mark Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2022cv18229
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MALDONADO-PASSAGE and JOSEPH MALDONADO
Defendant:
BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT LLC, CREATE MUSIC GROUP, INC., TIGER KING PUBLISHING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
McGloun v. Passage
as 6:2022cv06400
Petitioner:
Jovon McGloun
Respondent:
Mark Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumpter v. Passage
as 9:2022cv00861
Petitioner:
Terrell Sumpter
Respondent:
Superintendent Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villa v. Passage et al
as 1:2022cv02918
Petitioner:
Guillermo Villa
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Passage and Commissioner Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
