Cases 21 - 30 of 224
Friedler et al v. Stifel, Nicolaus, & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00752
Petitioner:
Stanley Friedler, M.D., Gail Friedler, Richard Friedler and others
Respondent:
Stifel, Nicolaus, & Company, Inc. and Coleman Joseph Devlin
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Lawrence v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 8:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Philips RS North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Oak Plaza, LLC v. Buckingham et al
as 8:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Oak Plaza, LLC
Defendant:
David T. Buckingham, Susan Buckingham, Richard Buckingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv03263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Yu v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 1:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
San San Yu
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC and Philips RS North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tonkins v. Moyer et al
as 1:2020cv02679
Plaintiff:
Cedric Rodriquez Tonkins
Defendant:
Other Unknown Defendants, J. Philip Morgan and Stephen T. Moyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Barber v. Burnett et al.
as 1:2020cv02611
Plaintiff:
Charles Barber
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS), Oluwasegun Fashae, Philipe Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
