Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Banks v. Petal City Police Dept
as 2:2020cv00029
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Petal City Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Biloxi Police Dept.
as 1:2019cv00965
Plaintiff:
Nigellus Devonte Davis
Defendant:
Biloxi Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Diberville Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00971
Plaintiff:
Nigellus Devonte Davis
Defendant:
Diberville Police Dept., Infinity and Mercedes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Ocean Springs Police Dept.
as 1:2019cv00966
Plaintiff:
Nigellus Devonte Davis
Defendant:
Ocean Springs Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00822
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Bryan Matthews, Gulfport Police Dept, State of Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driggs v. City of Ocean Springs Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00267
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs Police Dept., City of Ocean Springs, Terry Hines and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Driggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robins v. Town of Richton City Hall Police Dept. et al
as 2:2019cv00011
Defendant:
IRS, Town of Richton City Hall Police Dept., Cherita Okora and others
Plaintiff:
Edwina Robins
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Nichlos et al
as 1:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ray Reed
Defendant:
Nichlos and Starkville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Coffeeville Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Tyrowone Louis Kimble
Defendant:
Coffeeville Police Dept., Mark Martin, Gage Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Coffeeville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tyrowone Kimble
Defendant:
Coffeeville Police Dept., Grant Gammill , Mark Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
