Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Ponder v. Avalon Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00336
Defendant:
Avalon Correctional Services, Inc., Greg Basham, Loy Cerrano and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Ponder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Broadcast Music, Inc et al v. C.D.J.M., Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00187
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc , House of Cash, Inc. , Moebetoblame Music and others
Defendant:
C.D.J.M., Inc., Sidney F. Cade and Richard B. Ponder
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Romero v. Kail et al
as 2:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero
Defendant:
NFN Kail, NFN Chavez, Judith L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunnelley v. Livingston et al
as 2:2013cv00230
Plaintiff:
Eddie A Nunnelley, Jr
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rissi Owens, Charles McDuffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. Livingston et al
as 2:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Weldon Boyce Bridges
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rissi Owens, Charles McDuffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Baker et al
as 2:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Forrest Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jamie L Baker, Michael Hooten, Darrell K Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponder v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 4:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ponder
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sawyer
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, David Potter, Richard E. Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrow v. Ponder et al
as 2:2013cv00434
Plaintiff:
Whitney Burrow
Defendant:
David Ponder and Landstar Ranger Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Courverler v. Clark et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jason Charles Courverler
Defendant:
Brain Clark, NFN Edgar, NFN Ponder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
