Cases 21 - 30 of 1,181
(PC) Dixon v. Clendenin et al
as 2:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Robert Dixon
Defendant:
Stephanie Clendenin and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Marquis Price v. David Holbrook et al
as 5:2024cv01256
Defendant:
Shina Patel, Jesse Suarez and David Holbrook
Plaintiff:
Kevin Marquis Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Holbrook et al
as 5:2024cv03474
Defendant:
David Holbrook, Jesse Suarez and Shina Patel
Plaintiff:
Kevin Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClinton v. Blass
as 3:2024cv03363
Defendant:
Pamela Price, Donald O'Neal, Jacob Blass and others
Plaintiff:
Marquice McClinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cano v. Salmonson et al
as 2:2024cv01568
Defendant:
Figueroa-Price, Appel and S. Salmonson
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vivi Stafford MD v. Department State Hospitals et al
as 2:2024cv04339
Defendant:
Lori Clark, Department State Hospitals and Brandon Price
Plaintiff:
Vivi Stafford, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert E Martin v. Brandon Price
as 8:2024cv01118
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Petitioner:
Robert Edwin Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2024cv02946
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Price Ford of Turlock
Plaintiff:
Victoria Wood and Kenneth Lano Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Price v. Saini
as 4:2024cv02899
Defendant:
Amrit Saini
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv02943
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Fernando Cortez
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
