Cases 21 - 30 of 292
Doobay v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv12007
Petitioner:
Karamchand Doobay
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Chavez v. Breckon et al
as 1:2022cv00452
Petitioner:
Aaron Chavez
Respondent:
M. Breckon, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cardello-Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10520
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Executive Policy Team/Committee of MDOC, Administrative Management Team/Division of MDOC and others
Woods v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv10381
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Parole Commission and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Mims #838715 v. Erickson et al
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Doyle Mims #838715
Defendant:
Peggy Erickson, Unknown Moyle, Unknown Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tennille v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2022cv10171
Petitioner:
Lawrence Kemp Tennille
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cherry Health Community Treatment Center, Matthew Call and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fleming v. Director Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv10080
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Fleming
Respondent:
Director Bureau of Prisons
McElhaney v. WASHINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv13021
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen McElhaney
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, John Christiansen, Dr. RUSSELL SCABBO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
