Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Lipper v. Bond et al
as 2:2021cv04097
Defendant:
Jimmy More, Pettis County Prosecutor, Middlehouser and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher C S Lipper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Jackson County Prosecutor's Office
as 4:2021cv00020
Plaintiff:
Victor White
Defendant:
Jackson County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michaux v. Jackson County Prosecutor Office et al
as 4:2020cv00955
Defendant:
Charles H McKenzie, Jackson County Sheriff Department, Danielle Christine Sediqzad and others
Plaintiff:
Latisah Michaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. St. Louis Police Dept. et al
as 4:2020cv01637
Defendant:
Assist Atty General, Senator, St. Louis City Police Chief and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michaux v. Jackson County Prosecutor Office et al
as 4:2020cv01545
Defendant:
Charles H McKenzie, Jackson County Sheriff Department, Jackson County Prosecutor Office and others
Plaintiff:
Latisah Michaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
White v. Jackson
as 4:2020cv00815
Defendant:
Victor White and Jackson County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Villegas v. Becker et al
as 1:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Nick Becker, Unknown Prosecutor, Unknown Public Defender and others
Plaintiff:
Salvador Villegas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Tubbesing et al
as 4:2020cv00231
Respondent:
David Judge Byrn, Director of Mental Health, Tara Tubbesing and others
Petitioner:
Diego Montez Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Isgar v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00859
Defendant:
Prosecutors of 26th Judicial Court, State of Missouri, Judge Aaron Koepper and others
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
