Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Texas Neurological and Pain Institute, P.A. et al v. Group Resources, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00121
Defendant:
Group Resources, Inc., Purvis Industries, Ltd. and Purvis PT, LLC
Plaintiff:
Providence Health Care Service of Waco and Texas Neurological and Pain Institute, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Parmar et al v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
as 4:2011cv00613
Plaintiff:
Vijay Parmar and Purvi Parmar
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HB Plus Bandamatic, Inc. v. MTC South, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00610
Plaintiff:
HB Plus Bandamatic, Inc.
Defendant:
MTC South, Inc. and James W Purvis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purvis Operating Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company
as 7:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Purvis Operating Co.
Defendant:
St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Alexander v. Purvis et al
as 6:2008cv00034
Plaintiff:
Fred Franklin Alexander
Defendant:
Delbert Purvis, Shirley J. Beazley, Santee D. Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Fox
as 1:2007cv00939
Petitioner:
Purvis Ray Cartwright
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cartwright v. Fox
as 1:2007cv00734
Petitioner:
Purvis Ray Cartwright
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
