Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Rapp v. York
as 9:2013cv00599
Plaintiff: John Rapp
Defendant: Nathen York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rapp et al v. Mercedes-Bens of Smithtown et al
as 2:2013cv00260
Defendant: Nancy J. Buzzetta, Competition Automotive Group, John Does and others
Plaintiff: Marni Pineda, James F. Rapp and Anthony Soriano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv01698
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rapp v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv06515
Plaintiff: Traci Rapp
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. Rapp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2012cv00084
Plaintiff: Peter A. Scott, Sr.
Defendant: J. Rapp, S. Chumas and Imam Shamsideen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04332
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brooks v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02938
Plaintiff: Keith Brooks
Defendant: The City of New York, Alexander Rapp and P.O.'s John Doe #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00936
Plaintiff: Tanya Giles
Defendant: The City of New York, Angel Gonzalez, Pedro Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Martino et al
as 5:2010cv00637
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Robert Martino
Garnishee: Bill Rapp Nissan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?