Cases 21 - 28 of 28
COOK et al v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv60720
Plaintiff:
DOUG J COOK, DOUG J COOK, FRANCIS J DETERS and others
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A P GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY,, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RAPP et al v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv60728
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAPP and WILLIAM RAPP
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A P GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY,, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NICHOLAS v. EVANS et al
as 1:2008cv00350
Defendant:
SCOTT ARTHUR EVANS, DAUPHIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES NICHOLAS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv04764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAPP v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv80566
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAPP
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RAPP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv04902
Plaintiff:
MARY RAPP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
NICHOLAS v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2007cv00324
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. NICHOLAS
Defendant:
SEAN J. MCLAUGHLIN, LOWELL WITMER, SCOTT A. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAPP et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67737
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH W. RAPP and ALIDA C. RAPP
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORP. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
