Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01224
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. Morgan County School District
as 5:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lynette Brown
Defendant:
Morgan County School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. Target Stores, Inc
as 2:2013cv00817
Plaintiff:
Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development
Defendant:
Target Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Penaloza et al v. Drummond Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00393
Plaintiff:
Marisol Melo Penaloza , Ana Gregoria Palomi Romero , Luz Marina Castillo Manjarres and others
Defendant:
Drummond Company, Inc., Drummond Ltd., Drummond USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Newton, et al v. State of Alabama, et al(PANEL)(MEMBER)
as 2:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Newton , Alabama Democratic Conference , Framon Weaver, Sr. and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama , Robert J. Bentley and Beth Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Butler v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Rosa Butler
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Banks et al v. Birmingham Board of Education
as 2:2012cv01682
Plaintiff:
Eleazier Banks , Carley Dawson , Peggy Lewis and others
Defendant:
Birmingham Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
